wood versus composite decking uk

wood vs. composite -

composite decking costs less over its lifetime than does wood and lasts longer too. while pressure-treated lumber may cost less initially maintenance costs are significantly higher. on average maintaining a wood deck will cost £300-£550 per year.【Get Price】

5 factors when choosing wood or composite decking | kujo yardwear

wooden decking is usually cedar pine or redwood. most are pressure treated to resist rot but can warp stain or splinter. when left a lighter color they don't absorb much solar heat but the darker the color of a wood deck the more heat it can gather. 2. maintenance. all decks whether wood or composite deserve at least one good annual ...【Get Price】

benefits of composite decking vs wood - compare decking materials

let’s look into the benefits of wood decking and the benefits of composite decking vs wood. on this deck we incorporated tropical collection (amazon mist) composite deck and fascia boards with a custom built (pressure treated) pergola gas fireplace and we finished the whole thing off with some really nice natural (white) ledgestone.【Get Price】

decking vs composite decking - wood-free ...

most composite decking combines plastic with wood fibres. but decking is made from wood-free polyurethane combined with mineral stone to create a unique resin mineral board that’s tough enough for use in outdoor environments all year round.【Get Price】

timber and composite decking: what's the difference ...

composite decking comes in various forms but tends to be comprised of a recycled plastic and wood compound with a hard plastic shell. composite decking comes in a range of colours to suit all tastes. durability. composite decking products such as boast high levels of durability having been specially engineered to be fade stain scratch ...【Get Price】

composite decking vs. wood | today's creative life

how long does composite decking last? traditional wood decks have a lifespan of 10 to 15 years depending on the type of wood being used. of course redwood or cedar is more expensive and will last longer than pine or pre-treated woods but the cost of this type of wood is sometimes 3 times higher and there is still the cost of yearly maintenance.【Get Price】

composite vs. wood decking | the money pit

tom: well composite decking is going to be more costly than wood decking but the tradeoff is a lot less maintenance; almost no maintenance. you just have to clean it from time to time. leslie: yeah instead of having to refinish every say five years depending on the product that you put on a wood deck.【Get Price】

composite decking weight vs. wood - ehow

wood species commonly used as decking on patios and decks include redwood cedar and pressure-treated pine. in recent years other wood species have become available as have composite and metal decking. decking is sold in the nominal 5/4-by-6 size which actually measures 1 inch by 5-1/2 inches.【Get Price】

hardwood vs composite decking ? which one to choose - petal uk

both hardwood and composite decking have advantages and disadvantages. here are a few factors which you need to consider when you are making your decision【Get Price】

what is the best composite decking? | the company ltd

unlike other composites decking is hand moulded and contains no wood content at all so avoids all the problems associated with wood. instead it is made from a unique resin/stone composite material with the addition of a unique lastane® non-porous surface that provides superb grip even when wet.【Get Price】

wood vs composite decking | cedar mill craftworks

building or replacing a deck is a big investment and it is important to consider both wood and composite options. for the purest and homeowner who has the time and interest truly there is nothing better than the look and feel of a cedar deck.【Get Price】